As part of the last-minute flurry of rule-passing, the Bush administration wants to pass legislation that would protect from discrimination health care providers who oppose procedures like abortion, sterilization, and IUD insertion that they find morally objectionable. Similar laws protect doctors who refuse to write and pharmacists who refuse to fill birth control or emergency contraception prescriptions because they disagree with them on religious grounds.
Sorry…I just feel like you probably *should* discriminate against people who refuse to do the job you’ve hired them to do. If you find part of a certain job “morally objectionable,” you probably shouldn’t take that job. I can “morally object” to factoring if I want to; I have that right. If, however, I feel so strongly about this that I refuse to teach it, even though that’s part of the job I signed up for voluntarily, I shouldn’t get to have that job anymore. Letting me keep my job and protecting me for my refusal to do part of it is not in the best interest of my students’ education. They have a right to learn about factoring, and it’s not MY right to make that choice for them.
Additionally…
“Pharmacies said the rule would allow their employees to refuse to fill prescriptions for contraceptives and could ‘lead to Medicaid patients being turned away.” State officials said the rule could void state laws that require insurance plans to cover contraceptives and require hospitals to offer emergency contraception to rape victims.
The Ohio Health Department said the rule ‘could force family planning providers to hire employees who may refuse to do their jobs’ — a concern echoed by Cecile Richards, president of the Planned Parenthood Federation of America.”