In The Woods shares a number of striking parallels with another book I read a few years called Case Histories, by Kate Atkinson. In addition to both being award-winning debut novels by female writers that received enormous praise, many key aspects of the plot are quite similar: A thirty-something relationship-challenged white male cop/p.i. who is haunted by the infamous and unsolved disappearance of a local child/children twenty-some-odd years ago in a backwater area of the UK investigates a somehow related crime in the same area. Along the way various creepy earth-shattering revelations about and connections between both crimes are uncovered, and lots of bad coffee is drunk by various hard-boiled but slightly quirky police types.
In The Woods also reminded me of Case Histories in that it got a ton of fantastic reviews, made the NY Times bestseller list for several weeks running, and left me wondering what all the fuss was about. Supposedly, “French’s plot twists and turns will bamboozle even the most astute reader;” maybe, if the book happens to be the first mystery/thriller/police procedural said astute reader has ever read. I can’t blame French too much for this; the fact is that it’s pretty darn difficult to come up with a truly unique storyline in this genre, and for all that this one is dressed up as sophisticated and edgy, it was remarkably predictable.
The tone of the book also reminded me a lot of Case Histories: way overdone imagery, melodramatic characters, painfully not-so-witty banter, and the kind of deluge of pop culture references that guarantees the whole thing will feel stale ten years from now. I couldn’t help feeling that the book would have been ten times as readable if French had just stopped trying so hard, especially with the dialogue. For the record, it does still beat Case Histories; the characters aren’t quite so caricature-y, and there’s not as much gratuitous (and sometimes creepy) sex.
All in all, it was a decent vacation / plane ride read, and if you really really like cop mysteries that don’t try to be anything more than that, then maybe this is your book. “Ambitious and extraordinary,” however, is in my opinion going a bit far.